
Danny is the acting headteacher of the school, which was formed as a result of a merger between Kirkton High School and Rockwell High School. The school roll is around 600 and there are 52 teaching staff.
Danny’s definition of coaching is that it is a process which aims to bring the solutions out of a person and which supports the coachee to find the solution. In contrast, giving the mentee the benefit of their experience is the role of the mentor, which he suggests is a process which works very well with newly qualified teachers (NQTs) although he adds that the mentor would hopefully use a coaching model too.
Danny’s initial involvement in this area was to support teachers using a mentoring approach. When the Scottish Executive Education Department pilot was introduced, he was invited to bid for some funding. His successful bid allowed him to have 12 teachers, including two of the senior management team (SMT), trained by an external provider.
At the same time a group of staff were working with all staff in a collegiate way, firstly to establish the aims and values of the school but also to change the way they communicated with each other. This involved all staff in a series of 12 in-service sessions looking, through circle time, at their shared aims and values. This was a new way of consultation.
The nature of these ‘conversations’ was not dissimilar to the coaching process. There were also similarities here with restorative practices, which the school had introduced in session 2005/06. It was important for the school that pupils’ voices were also heard and this happened through social education classes. The philosophy behind this approach centred on a humanitarian view of how schools might be. Coaching was seen as key to taking continuing professional development forward.
In the meantime, another 12 staff were trained, the rest of SMT, some principal teachers (PTs) and a few more teachers, bringing the total number of staff trained to 24 out of a staff of 52. At this stage it was possible to take a serious look at reviewing the process of PRD, which it was felt had become stale, to include coaching as part of the process and a coaching group was formed to do this.
The new coaching professional review and development (PRD) model was set up as an alternative with all but one member of staff agreeing to be involved; the traditional method was still available to that member of staff. The new model started in September 2007 with coaching conversations taking place between coach and coachee three times per year, when goals are set by the coachee. Goals set must articulate with the school's aims and values and are reviewed three times per year with the coach.
The coaches meet before each block of coaching sessions and co-coach each other. There is also an evaluation of approach at the end of each block of coaching and so far the feedback is very positive. The 12 hours required for coaching comes from the working time agreement and is agreed by an executive working group within the school. While the structure is still hierarchical, it is hoped that a SMT involvement on 360 degree evaluation might initiate a change to a less hierarchical structure.
One of the key areas of learning for Danny was the way that, even outwith the PRD/Coaching model, all staff involved have embraced coaching in different ways and all those trained continue to see a value in it. He also thinks it is critical to keep an eye to practice to ensure that it is coaching that is taking place, ie a solution-focused approach, rather than mentoring.
For more information please email Daniel McDonald (Acting Headteacher, Baldragon High School, Dundee City).
Comments
Jim Keegans,
27 February 2008, 1.09 pm
Recently had the opportunity as a member of the National CPD Team to visit Danny at Baldragon HS. Very impressed with the coaching culture which Danny has encouraged across the school and the very positive impact of this on staff and pupils. The process of professional review and development is much more valued by staff and has informed the review of the PRD process currently being undertaken by the National CPD Team.
Peter Flood,
27 February 2008, 1.15 pm
I agree that it is really important to ensure that the focus of coaching should be solution-based. I have found that a good way to do this is to create coaching pairs within each department of the school.The school agrees a focus for the observation, in our case AiFL. The pair then oberve each other's practice in the classroom.and then use coaching techniques to give and receive feedback followed by next steps with a review date.Crucial to the sustainability of this is the link SMT and PT's involvement,where one of them takes the teacher's class either for part or all of the lesson, whilst the teacher acting as coaching observes his or her colleague.
Joe Lafferty,
4 March 2008, 11.11 am
Good to see Danny's & Baldraggon's story here. I think it is a great example of how the SEED project 'seeded' ideas, provided structure/resources for others to pick up and run with. The organic and enabling nature of this work, in many ways modelling a coaching approach, has had significant impact in many areas. With some of my own work in Education, a number of Educational Leaders have commented on how a coaching approach to PRD could bring a "more humane" and "paper light" process for this work. Focusing on the successes, and the development areas, developing a meaningful plan that the individual owns. Encouraging people to do their own work in terms of self evaluation/reflective practice. One caveat for me would be that for this to be effective, this would need to take place in the context of an ongoing coaching relationship. Then the PRD interview can be an extended time of joint reflection on learning, development and action. No surprises, developed from an ongoing coaching conversation. A final observation; I must admit (as an 'outsider') to being astonished that many Authorities have a THREE YEAR cycle for PRD. For an institution/profession that is all about learning, this seems bizarre to me.
Con Morris,
4 March 2008, 1.23 pm
In the context of Joe's points about coaching approach to PRD, you might be interested in the new toolkit coming later in the year from LTS and the CPD team, CPDReflect (more info on the CPD team blog at http://ltsblogs.org.uk/cpdteam/2008/03/04/what-is-cpdreflect/). CPDReflect is being designed to be assist the PRD process and will open up further flexibility for coaching and peer review in this area.